Reef Research: Volume 9 No. 1 March 1999

Satellite Telemetry and Green Turtles
C. Sylvia Spring
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority

When you carry out research there are often risks associated with the research, usually for the subject of the research. In designing projects researchers have to weigh up whether the benefits are worth the risks involved. Sometimes you never find out how the research has affected the animal concerned. My experience working with marine turtles is outlined below. It is an example of a good outcome when there were risks
for the turtle involved.
O
n 7 April 1990 I attached a Platform Terminal Transmitter (PTT) to a post-nesting green turtle at Heron Island in the Capricorn-Bunker Group to track its movements away from the nesting beach (Spring 1994). The turtle, who I called 'Rosie', was a new recruit into the Heron Island nesting colony and had been tagged, by the Queensland
Photo: Green Turtle
Green turtle with transmitter, Heron Island
Parks and Wildlife Service staff, nesting for the first time on Heron Island on 13 January 1990. The turtle nested again on 26 January, on 7 April and finally on 25 April 1990 before setting off on her migration to her feeding grounds. The PTT attached to her carapace would track her movements during this migration. This information is important because if we are to conserve green turtles, which are vulnerable to extinction, conservation measures need to be applied across their entire range, not just at the nesting beaches.

The PTT (ST-3 Model) was constructed by Telonics Inc. USA and contained software developed by researchers in the United States, which recorded water temperature, dive times and dive counts. The PTT, powered by two lithium D-cell batteries, was housed inside a waterproof PVC tube eight centimetres in diameter and thirty-four centimetres long. The housing was pressure resistant to 150 metres depth.

The PTT was attached to the turtle with a 0.5 metre flexible stainless steel cable linked to stainless steel attachment plates which were bolted to the rear edge of the turtle carapace. Ferrous bolts were used as these would corrode in approximately 12 months, releasing the PTT and the attachment plates from the turtle about the same time as the batteries failed.

A saltwater switch built into the housing was designed to activate the PTT whenever the turtle was at the water's surface. While switched on, the PTT transmits signals at regular intervals. Orbiting National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites receive transmissions from PTTs in visibility during passes and are equipped with the Argos Data Collection and Location System1 which calculates the location of the turtle for each transmission received. In this way the turtle can be tracked on its migration.

There were several concerns for the turtle as a result of this research. There was the possibility of the tether becoming entangled and trapping the turtle, as well as the possibility of infection or damage from bolt holes drilled through the edge of the carapace. While procedures were designed to minimise any discomfort or the likelihood of infection for the turtle as a result of this research, it was not known whether the turtle would become entangled. This was a risk that was weighed against the information about the turtle migration which might be gained by the research. The project was thoroughly scrutinised and passed by the then Australian Nature Conservation Authority Animal Ethics Committee.

The satellite telemetry data showed that after leaving Heron Island the turtle travelled 300 kilometres north to Broad Sound. From there she travelled 1800 kilometres north to Torres Strait and then a further 1200 kilometres west into northern Australian/southern Indonesian waters. The turtle was tracked for 234 days and migrated over 3300 kilometres from her nesting site (figure 1).

map
Figure 1. Post-nesting migration of green turtle from Heron Island into the Arafura Sea, a distance of over 3300 kilometres.

Despite the success of the research in terms of its results, I often wondered about the fate of this turtle - had I caused its death as a result of this research? I recently received a letter from Dr Colin Limpus, head of the Queensland Turtle Research Project, Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, informing me that the turtle had returned to Heron Island for the 1997-98 nesting season after an eight-year absence or remigration interval. The turtle was detected by the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service turtle research team during their beach census study and they observed that there was no obvious injury from the PTT attachment and no attachment metal remained on the turtle.

The news that the turtle was alive and well was great news to me. She remained at Heron Island for the full nesting season, nesting six times before setting off on her migration north. And this time we have a good idea of where she is going.


Reference

Spring, C.S. 1994, Satellite Tracking Green Turtles in Australian Waters - Preliminary Results, in Proceedings of the Australian Marine Turtle Conservation Workshop held at Sea World Nara Resort, Gold Coast, 14-17 November 1990: Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage and the Australian Nature Conservation Agency, pp.192-197.

1 The Argos system is a cooperative project of the Centre National d'Etrudes Spatiales (CNES) of France, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The primary purpose of Argos is to collect environmental data.


to RR homepage back to Contents to next page
back to RR homepage | back to contents this issue | to next page


Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810. Phone: (07) 4750 0700, Fax: (07) 4772 6093
E-mail: registry@gbrmpa.gov.au