Monitoring Aircraft Usage of
the Marine Park:
A Case Study from
Whitehaven Beach, Whitsunday Island

Mary Hamilton1 and James Innes2
1
Tropical Environment Studies and Geography, James Cook University Qld 4811
2 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority


Whitehaven Beach

Aircraft overflights and associated noise in national parks is an environmental management issue which has attracted the attention of researchers in the United States of America and Australia for at least the last 10 years (e.g. Beal 1994; United States National Parks Service 1994).

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority recognises that sound from aircraft operations in the Marine Park is a management issue (Adami and Jennings 1995). Accordingly the Authority has developed guidelines for the management of aircraft operations in particular areas of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, such as Whitehaven Beach in the Whitsunday Islands. What is critical for assessing whether these policies are effective, however, is the provision of accurate information on the impacts of aircraft activity upon the natural and cultural values ascribed to locations such as Whitehaven Beach (figure 1).


Figure 1. Whitsunday island and adjoining mainland,
North Queensland, Australia (insert showing Whithaven Beach)

To provide such information the Authority's Research and Monitoring Coordination Unit, in September 1998, commissioned a study of Whitehaven Beach/Bay to assess the impact of aircraft sound and other human activities upon visitor use, amenity and values held for the site.

The Authority will use this information to develop policy for the management of aircraft operations and other uses of Whitehaven Beach to maintain the integrity of the settings applied to the area as per the Whitsundays Plan of Management (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 1998).

The research project comprises two studies. One research program was a pilot trial study undertaken by Mary Hamilton, a post-graduate student from James Cook University, that recorded aircraft sound and activity levels at Whitehaven Bay.

Jayne Ormsby and Scott Shafer are conducting the other research program. This study involves the admin-istration of a survey to local residents of the Whitsundays and visitors to Whitehaven. The survey asks about the values those groups hold for the site and their perception of the impact of aircraft and other activities on their use and amenity of the area.

The aircraft sound monitoring project has concluded and a published report will be available from the Authority by October 1999. The local resident and visitor values and perceptions study is in the data analysis stage. It is also planned that a report on that study be published in October 1999.

This paper will briefly report on the outcome of the aircraft sound monitoring project and a future issue of Reef Research will report on the results of the Ormsby/Shafer study.

For management purposes Whitehaven Beach is divided into a range of recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) settings designed to provide for a variety of user tastes and environmental needs. The ROS is a park management tool that aims to provide Park visitors with a range of different experiences. The basic premise of the ROS is that quality recreational experiences can best be assured by providing a diversity of recreation opportunities. A recreation opportunity is defined as 'a chance for a person to participate in a specific recreational activity in a specific setting in order to realise a predictable recreational experience' (Stankey and Wood 1982:5).

The ROS, as applied to Whitehaven, seeks to provide for a range of experiences that correspond with the intent of the settings as defined in the Whitsundays Plan of Management. The settings along Whitehaven Beach are high use (setting 2) at the southern most end of the beach, moderate use (setting 3), natural (setting 4) and protected at the northern most end of the Beach at Hill Inlet (setting 5) (refer figure 2). In the high use setting it would be expected that visitors would experience the highest intensity of a variety of human impacts. The degree of impact decreases in a gradient from the south end to the north end of the beach in a line with the definitions of the setting. The protected setting has the least intensity of human induced impacts. For management to achieve this it should seek to ensure that the attributes (such as degree of crowding and natural quite) required to ensure the provision of each setting are appropriate. Various human-induced variables act upon these settings subsequently influencing their attributes. Aircraft overflight frequencies and their associated sound levels are two such variables. Mary Hamilton’s research sought to investigate these two variables relative to the four settings along Whitehaven Beach, Whitsunday Island. The study also sought to compare the results between the settings.

The data for the research was collected during two four-day field trips in October 1998, a relatively low use season for aircraft tour operators. Each site was situated approximately in the middle of the setting it represented (refer figure 2). Data was collected on the frequency of aircraft overflights and attributes of their associated sound levels as well as background sound levels.

As a comparison with aircraft impacts, data was also recorded on watercraft and human activity sound levels. Sound level data was primarily collected with Techcessories analogue sound level meters.

In terms of the frequency of overflights and their sound level duration above background sound levels, sites (settings) 3 and 4 were found to experience the greatest impact from aircraft. This was followed by sites (settings) 5 and 2.

Thus the high use setting, which would be expected to experience the highest impact, actually experienced the lowest impact. In terms of the absolute and average maximum aircraft induced sound levels experienced, no significant difference was found between the settings although raw results suggested that sites 3 and 4 experienced the greatest impact from these variables followed by sites 2 and 5.

Most aircraft events (88%) registered above back-ground sound levels and most (71%) affected three or all study sites. Overall, the busiest time of day was from 1130 to 1330. The most common type of aircraft observed were seaplanes, followed by helicopters, other light aircraft and high-altitude jets. Seaplane take-offs and helicopter landings and take-offs had the greatest sound impact. Setting 2 was found to have the greatest impact from watercraft and people. Settings 3, 4 and 5 received similar levels of impact from both these variables.


Figure 2. The recreation opportunity spectrum settings
along Whitehaven Beach, Whitsunday Islands.

Although a significant difference was found between the frequencies of aircraft and the duration of aircraft induced sound levels between settings, the trend exhibited did not follow that expected by the definition of the ROS settings. No significant difference in aircraft induced sound impact was found between settings. Therefore no gradient of impact was exhibited for this variable. Consequently this study concludes that aircraft sound and activity are influencing the attributes of the ROS settings along Whitehaven Beach beyond the levels and gradient of impact expected for the types of settings. Thus, in relation to aircraft, the ROS spectrum along Whitehaven Beach does not appear to be functioning as it should. It is speculated that a more detailed study may confirm this.

The results of this trial aircraft study will be compared with the results of the values, use and amenity study being conducted by Ormsby and Shafer. The results from both studies will provide the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority with information to allow a more detailed evaluation of aircraft and other activities at Whitehaven Bay. The methods developed and trialled by Mary Hamilton at Whitehaven could also have application for other locations in the Marine Park.


References

Adami, T. and Jennings, G. 1995, Draft discussion paper: management of aircraft operations in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Unpublished paper, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.

Beal, P.A. 1994, Campers' attitudes to noise and regulation in Queensland National Parks, Australian Parks and Recreation, 30(4): 38–40.

Great Barrier Reef Marine Authority 1998, Whitsundays Plan of Management, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville.

Stankey, G.H. and Wood, J. 1982, The recreation opportunity spectrum: an introduction, Australian Parks and Recreation, February: 6–15.

United Sates National Parks Service 1994, Report to Congress: Report on the Effects of Aircraft Overflights on the National Parks System, United States National Parks, Washington.


to RR homepage back to Contents
back to RR homepage | back to contents this issue


Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810. Phone: (07) 4750 0700, Fax: (07) 4772 6093
E-mail: registry@gbrmpa.gov.au