Reef Research: Volume 7 No. 3-4 September-December 1997
MARINE PARK DEBRIS IN THE FAR NORTHERN SECTION
OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK


David Haynes
D
umping of rubbish and other debris into the marine environment has become an increasingly serious problem (Ross et al. 1991). Discarded debris can have a range of environmental consequences. It can entangle wildlife and cause limb amputation and/or death through drowning or strangulation. Debris can also be ingested and cause internal blockages and result in starvation or other complications, particularly in animals such as turtles (Laist 1987; Beck and Barros 1991; Hutchinson and Simmonds 1991; Slip and Burton 1991; Lucas 1992). Dumped glass containers and medical wastes may be hazardous to humans coming in contact with them (Dixon and Dixon 1981). photo rubbish on seagroundThere are also economic impacts of debris and rubbish accumulation on beaches. These include the loss of aesthetic values of recreational areas which are reliant on tourism-generated income (Corbin and Singh 1993; Garrity and Levings 1993; Faris and Hart 1994) and the fishing industry may also be impacted through the loss of fish catches to abandoned or lost fishing gear (Dixon and Dixon 1981; Jones 1995).

There is little data available concerning the extent of rubbish accumulation on Australian beaches, including the northern Queensland coast (Wace 1995; The Australian Marine Debris Status Review 1996). This report summarises data on the quantity and nature of debris contamination of islands and cays in the Far Northern Section of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park north of Lockhart River. Twelve vegetated sand cays and three continental islands were surveyed for stranded debris during June 1996 (Haynes 1997) (figure 1). All visible anthropogenic debris (i.e. that greater than 1-2 cm (Dixon and Dixon 1983; Ribic et al. 1992)) stranded between the low water mark and the vegetation line along the perimeter of the twelve sand cays was recorded. Visible debris (that greater than 1-2 cm) stranded over the same beach height was also recorded on exposed beaches on the three continental islands. Results were recorded as numbers of items of debris by composition (Dixon and Dixon 1983; Ribic et al. 1992). The perimeter of each cay or length of island beach over which debris was recorded was calculated from a computer-based Geographic Information System.

figure 1
Figure 1. Debris survey locations, Far Northern Section, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park

To look at this figure click here


A range of rubber, plastic and glass artefacts were commonly found on far northern sand cays and islands (table 1). The majority of glassware observed consisted of alcoholic drink-bottles and neon and incandescent light globes. Rubber footwear (thongs) comprised the majority of rubber debris and small fishing net floats and fragmented packing cases were the source of most polystyrene debris. The most commonly encountered metal and aluminium debris was aluminium drink cans and aerosol spray-cans. Fishing netting, rope fragments and plastic bags were also found at many sites, but they were present in low densities (tables 1 and 2).

The most common debris on near-shore sand cays were artefacts made from plastics, rubber and glass. Plastic items were the most numerous item recorded on the two outer sand cays, and rubber, plastic and expanded polystyrene artefacts were common on exposed continental island beaches (table 2). The relative importance of plastics, polystyrene and glass in marine debris is typical of littered beaches (Pruter 1987; Corbin and Singh 1993; Garrity and Levings 1993; Wace 1995). Debris on sand cays was concentrated on the windward side of the cays (the south-eastern side) and was usually present only in very low concentrations on the lee side of most cays. Densities of stranded glass and rubber were similar on near-shore and outer sand cays, whereas outer cays had relatively higher densities of metal, plastic, rope and netting and polystyrene debris (table 2). Densities of plastic, rubber and polystyrene debris were much higher per length of beach on continental islands than on sand cays as surveyed island beaches were surrounded by rocky cliffs which tended to concentrate stranded debris and prevent wind driven re-mobilisation.

References

The Australian Marine Debris Status Review 1996, Final report to the ANZECC Working Party on Marine Debris, Maunsell Pty Ltd.

Beck, C.A. and Barros, N.B. 1991, The impact of debris on the Florida Manatee. Mar. Poll. Bull. 22: 508-510.

Corbin, C.J. and Singh, J.G. 1993, Marine debris contamination of beaches in St. Lucia and Dominica, Mar. Poll. Bull. 26: 325-328.

Dixon, T.R and Dixon, T.J. 1981, Marine litter surveillance. Mar. Poll. Bull. 12: 289-95.

Dixon, T.J. and Dixon, T.R. 1983, Marine litter distribution and composition in the North Sea, Mar. Poll. Res. 14: 145-148.

Faris, J. and Hart, K. 1994, Sea of Debris: A Summary of the Third International Conference on Marine Debris, North Carolina Sea Grants College Program.

Garrity, S.D. and Levings, S.C. 1993, Marine debris along the Caribbean coast of Panama. Mar. Poll. Bull. 26: 317-324.

Haynes, D. 1997, Marine debris on continental islands and sand cays in the Far Northern Section of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia, Mar. Poll. Bull. 34: 276-279.

Hutchinson, J. and Simmonds, M. 1991, A Review of the Effects of Pollution on Marine Turtles, London: Greenpeace.

Jones, M.M. 1995, Fishing debris in the Australian marine environment, Mar. Poll. Bull. 30: 25-33.

Laist, D.W. 1987, Overview of the biological effects of lost and discarded plastic debris in the marine environment. Mar. Poll. Bull. 18: 319-326.

Lucas, Z. 1992, Monitoring persistent litter in the marine environment on Sable Island, Nova Scotia. Mar. Poll. Bull. 24: 192-199.

Pruter, A.T. 1987, Sources, quantities and distribution of persistent plastics in the marine environment, Mar. Poll. Bull. 18: 305-310.

Ribic, C.A., Dixon, T.R. and Vining, I. 1992, Marine Debris Survey Manual, NOAA Technical Report NMFS 108, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA.

Ross, J.B., Parker, R. and Strickland, M. 1991, A survey of shoreline litter in Halifax Harbour 1989, Mar. Poll. Bull. 22: 245-248.

Slip, D.J. and Burton, H.R. 1991, Accumulation of fishing debris, plastic litter and other artefacts on Heard and Macquarie Islands in the Southern Ocean, Environ. Cons. 18: 249-254.

Wace, N. 1995, Ocean litter stranded on Australian coasts, pp. 73-87, in The State of the Marine Environment Report for Australia Technical Annex 2: Pollution, L.P. Zann and D.C. Sutton (eds), Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Australia.


to RR homepage back to Contents to next page
back to RR homepage | back to contents this issue | to next page


Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
PO Box 1379 TOWNSVILLE QLD 4810. Phone: (07) 4750 0700, Fax: (07) 4772 6093
E-mail: registry@gbrmpa.gov.au